![]() ![]() ![]() This is also the case for China, which is in the late stage of accelerated industrialization and urbanization. Many local governments have also taken quality of life as an important method of city marketing in the urban development practice (Hall 1995). Some studies show that cities with high quality of life can attract creative classes and high-tech enterprises, which are key factors to maintaining urban growth (Rogerson 1999 Florida 2014). The topic also draws extensive scholarly attention. With the acceleration of globalization, the new reconstruction of areal division of labour, and the transformation of urban governance from managerialism to entrepreneurialism (Harvey 1989 Sassen 2013), how to achieve sustainable urban growth and maintain urban competitiveness are key issues facing state and local governments. It is suggested that future urban development focus on high value-added and environmental-friendly industries, which can improve both local economic development and quality of life. Quality of life is related more to the economic structure. This study also shows that local economic development can promote quality of life, though they do not merely stand in a quantitative relation. The quality of life is generally better than local economic development in large cities across Western China and different cities display various spatial mismatch features. The results point to the significant differences in QoL among large Chinese cities and unlock the spatial mismatch between QoL and LED in these cities. ![]() By constructing the index system of QoL of large cities, this study analyses the spatial pattern of QoL in 39 largest cities across China and then introduces the spatial mismatch method to analyse the relationship between QoL and LED. The study aims to evaluate the quality of life in large Chinese cities and explore the relationship between life quality and local economic development. These 100 cities are welcoming, affordable and offer the space and opportunity to grow, both professionally and personally.Quality of life (QoL) is an important factor which influences local economic development (LED). If you’re a young person looking for a fresh start, sick of living paycheck to paycheck due to insane rent prices and want to find a community that will welcome you with open arms, this list is for you. If you want to learn more about how this list came together, please check out our methodology page and ranking criteria.Īt, we are passionate about finding the good and praising it, and each of these cities has something special to offer its residents. We also added more weight to some of our measures of diversity and inclusion in order to reflect what millennials are looking for in the cities they choose to call home. This year, we focused on mid-sized cities (generally defined as 500,000 population or smaller) that are attracting big waves of young people. Affordability is a core value for Livability, so we look for places that are growing wages and home values while maintaining an affordable cost of living. As home prices hit historical highs and inflation continues to rise, it is more important than ever that we create homes in places that are both affordable and functional for a diverse and growing population. population has either moved or considered moving. Since March 2020, more than 42% of the U.S. Yes, these are all statistically great places to live, but would you actually want to live here? What are the ways in which each of these cities is creating an environment that is accommodating for remote workers? Where can you spend a Saturday afternoon or meet your friends for happy hour after a long day? How is this city different from other places? This year, we started with the age-old question: Why should someone want to live here? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |